|
|
|
|
At Sea
|
|
|
|
2004 Season Field
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ship operations summary
|
|
Survey
1
|
|
|
Survey 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Season
Field
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDDIES Home => Data => 2004 Season Field At Sea => Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selection
of the target eddy feature
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-time
analysis of altimetric observations will provide maps of the
eddy field prior to and during our sampling operations (Figure
1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure
1: Example objective analysis of sea level anomaly (SLA) for
10 July 2003. Near real-time data feeds
from Jason, Topex, Geosat Follow On, and ERS were obtained through
the Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Real-Time Altimetry
Project; see http://www-ccar.colorado.edu/~realtime/welcome/.
|
|
|
As far as we know, there are three different types
of mid-ocean eddies in the Sargasso Sea (Figure 2): cyclones,
anticyclones, and mode-water eddies (MWEs).
Cyclones and MWEs are of interest to this
project, as both tend to displace upper ocean isopycnals toward the
surface, causing nutrient input into the euphotic zone. Whereas cyclones are identifiable in satellite
altimetry by virtue of their negative sea level anomaly (SLA), MWEs
are not distinguishable from anticyclones on the basis of altimetry
alone becauseboth result in positive SLA.
In principle, satellite-based SST could distinguish
these two, as anticyclone and MWEs would be characterized by warm and
cold SST anomalies, respectively. However,
given the paucity of reliable SST imagery in the Sargasso Sea during summer,
we will likely have to rely on in situ measurements to unequivocally distinguish
MWEs from anticyclones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy age is another key issue.
Whereas an intensifying cyclone will
have upwelling in its center, the isopycnals in the interior of
a decaying cyclone will be downwelling. The
earlier phase of the eddy’s lifetime will be when nutrient injection
and the associated biological response occur.
Summary of desirable characteristics for the target
eddy:
1. Young
2. Strong imprint on upper ocean physics, biology,
and chemistry (not necessarily a large amplitude SLA in the case
of a MWE).
3. Intensifying
4. Chemical impact discernible in real time (optical
NO3 sensor)
5. Biological impact discernible in real time (fluorometry,
microscope counts, VPR?)
6. Cyclone versus MWE?
a. unequivocal satellite determination
favors cyclones
b. trapping of near-inertial motions
and possible enhanced mixing favors MWEs
c. some of the big events at BATS have
been MWEs
Jenkins (1988) Summer 1986 event
McNeil et al. (1999) July
1995 eddy.
7. Proximity to BBSR: must be within 1 day’s steam
for Weatherbird II
Clearly, it will behoove us to sample several
eddies during the first survey cruise prior to making a decision about which
eddy we wish to spend the rest of the summer in.
Eddy
statistics from prior years can provide some guidance as to what
to expect: |
|
|
|
Figure 3. Eddy tracks for June through August,
1993-2001, 2003.
Cyclones are in blue, and anticyclones
are in red. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also:
Project Summary and Cruise Logistics:
HTML document updated April 7, 2004
Word file (.doc) of same
Powerpoint file from project meeting July
23, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
back to top
|
|
|
|